Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:00:42 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: testing@FreeBSD.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyAyODk0NzddIHN5cy9uZXRwZmlsL3BmL3JvdXRlX3RvOnBy?= =?UTF-8?B?ZWZlcl9pcHY2X25leHRob3BfbWl4ZWRfYWZfcmFuZG9tX3RhYmxlX2lwdjQg?= =?UTF-8?B?dGVzdCBmYWlscyBpbnRlcm1pdHRlbnRseSBpbiBDSQ==?= Message-ID: <bug-289477-32464-2i482MVwyG@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-289477-32464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-289477-32464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D289477 Kajetan Staszkiewicz <vegeta@tuxpowered.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vegeta@tuxpowered.net --- Comment #1 from Kajetan Staszkiewicz <vegeta@tuxpowered.net> --- The problem with this test and a few other similar ones is that they test random selection of pf loadbalancing. The test uses a route-to action with lists of good and bad nexthops. For each good nexthop it attempts a tcp connection up to 10 times and checks if this good nexthop was selected. Since it's testing the *random* algorithm it can occasionally fail. Even if= I raise the amount of connections being made it could still fail. Any idea ho= w to better test a random algorithm? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-289477-32464-2i482MVwyG>