From owner-freebsd-libh Mon May 6 12:23:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from postal.sdsc.edu (postal.sdsc.edu [132.249.20.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE8F37B403 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from multivac.sdsc.edu (multivac.sdsc.edu [132.249.20.57]) by postal.sdsc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6/server/38) with ESMTP id g46JNbn08312; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by multivac (8.11.6+Sun/1.11-SolarisClient) id g46JNaa01039; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:23:36 -0700 (PDT) To: Antoine Beaupre Cc: Jordan Hubbard , libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: util vs tools References: From: Max Okumoto Date: 06 May 2002 12:23:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: Antoine Beaupre's message of "Mon, 6 May 2002 13:49:43 -0400" Message-ID: Lines: 23 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You guys are right. We should only have one. It was just habit from a previous project where they seperated scripts from tools which were build from src. I will move all my stuff into tools. I would also like to move find_classes_descriptions.pl into tools. Max Okumoto Antoine Beaupre writes: > Well, as far as I can remember, both didn't exist until recently. > > A. > > Le Lundi 6 mai 2002, à 01:39 , Jordan Hubbard a écrit : > > > Probably historical - I don't see any problem with consolidating them. > > > >> Why have a util *AND* tools directory? > >> > >> Seems to me the utils in there should be both in tools *or* util. I'd > >> rather have them in tools. > >> > >> A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message