From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 2 17:24:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DC516A47E for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D62743D5D for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:24:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so162649uge for ; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:24:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jQHhN2ntcpuP23hO/QMNzjlHvbdwj51vYLX7shpbmkR2jWp8kkPUuHsh+7/d2KKzcqCRY02qMiHTdjLDKn5urJiEs3jrWO/SJXs99KbBpxYW1LSmzHhGcHUUtYSt5vkwKXySx/y0+rIPqOy7Dctg2dQbWDyTw6nFX+CXHslkFHU= Received: by 10.78.157.8 with SMTP id f8mr1027659hue.1162488244675; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:24:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.173.13 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:24:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <70e8236f0611020924o1f505adcna14deec82f1a5f44@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:24:04 +0000 From: "Joao Barros" To: "Andre Oppermann" In-Reply-To: <200611021653.kA2GrRWx008044@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200611021653.kA2GrRWx008044@repoman.freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_syscalls.c src/sys/sys libkern.h socket.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:24:08 -0000 On 11/2/06, Andre Oppermann wrote: > andre 2006-11-02 16:53:26 UTC > > Benchmarking shows significant improvements (95% confidence): > 45% less cpu (or 1.81 times better) with new sendfile vs. old sendfile (non-TSO) > 83% less cpu (or 5.7 times better) with new sendfile vs. old sendfile (TSO) > Impressive numbers! :-) -- Joao Barros