From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 19 05:52:53 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8D51065673
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:52:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from lab.alexdupre.com (cl-506.trn-01.it.sixxs.net
	[IPv6:2001:1418:100:1f9::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD958FC13
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:52:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (qmail 80715 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2008 05:52:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO athlon.alexdupre.com) (192.168.178.2)
	by lab.alexdupre.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2008 05:52:51 -0000
Message-ID: <48D33E32.2030607@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:52:50 +0200
From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
References: <200809151036.19674.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<200809181033.56619.jhb@freebsd.org> <48D2A979.7090809@FreeBSD.org>
	<200809181545.48487.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200809181545.48487.jhb@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies
	anymore
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:52:54 -0000

John Baldwin wrote:
> Ahh, I think I see now.  It requires one OPTIONS using port to mask the 
> dependencies.

Exactly.

>> I thought the same thing, probably yes, but I dunno why it was added in 
>> such way from the beginning, so I tried to create the simplest and 
>> surely working patch maintaining the current workflow.
> 
> Ok.

Probably it was added in such way because at the beginning there wasn't 
the config-conditional target and runing the config target for every 
port (re)build was not a bright idea. If I have time I'll try to make a 
patch following this rationale, but in the meanwhile my previous patch 
seems good enough.

--
Alex Dupre