From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 15 02:46:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA29523 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 02:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mixcom.mixcom.com (mixcom.mixcom.com [198.137.186.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA29517 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 02:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mixcom.mixcom.com (8.6.12/2.2) id EAA15164; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 04:46:50 -0500 Received: from p75.mixcom.com(198.137.186.25) by mixcom.mixcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma015155; Tue Apr 15 09:46:42 1997 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970415043856.00b43ef8@mixcom.com> X-Sender: sysop@mixcom.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 04:38:57 -0500 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: question about X.25 drivers Cc: Terry Lambert , jbryant@tfs.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 06:42 PM 4/14/97 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: --snip-- >> Who is actively maintaining "more"? Should it die and go away? 8-). > >An excellent example. For my side of the argument! :) > >more, if it broke, would be quickly fixed (by someone, me if no one >else) because so many people use it that it would also be quickly >noted. If X.25 broke and nobody noticed it for a year, then obviously >X.25 is in the "rarely if ever used" pile and probably need to go >away. QED. Not sure if a system (2.1.6 or .7?) was corrupt, but more was broke. The system was wiped clean, as another system on the same revision worked. Point being I use more and less. Less has to be added, more comes with. --snip-- ------------------------------------------- Jeff Mountin - System/Network Administrator jeff@mixcom.net MIX Communications Serving the Internet since 1990