From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 04:23:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1B6106566B for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 04:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D89F8FC0C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 04:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q2B4Nn2b021002; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:23:51 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:23:54 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201203102331.33701.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <20120311035326.GC23967@hemlock.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20120311035326.GC23967@hemlock.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203111123.54809.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: Chad Perrin Subject: Re: Suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 04:23:54 -0000 Hi, I think that your irony detectors got damaged while reading my post. I am sorry for this. On Sunday 11 March 2012 10:53:26 Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:31:33PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > On Saturday 10 March 2012 22:08:37 Alejandro Imass wrote: > > > > > > ALL of Windows' problems are precisely based on poor design... just to > > > name a few: > > > > - apps re-write system libs at will > > > > Isn't this another masterpiece FreeBSD is far off achieving? > > I'm not aware of any cases where installing or firing up an editor, web > server, or mail user agent alters base system libraries. I think you are > mistaken. > Isn't this a cool feature? > > > > > > - no lib versioning > > > > I think that you are wrong here. It a long time ago but I think I > > remember they put a version number into the library name. > > I read "no lib versioning" as meaning "we don't get the same support for > being able to use multiple versions of a library for different purposes," > but maybe I'm mistaken. How can you say this? > > > > - no filesystem-based security > > > > FAT rules! > > Uh . . . what? It is on every phone, every camera, every toaster ... > > > > - default network protocols are insecure > > > > Windows has meanwhile default network protocols? I think, I have to do > > some catching up. > > I suspect this was a reference to things like SMB/CIFS and other common > networking protocols and toolsets on MS Windows systems. Is this all in there by default? Erich