From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Aug 29 06:26:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794C23CEC43 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 06:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdmhW62Bdz41Fp for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 06:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.55.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55D771AF20F; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 06:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 07T6QgUG082000 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 29 Aug 2020 06:26:42 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: (from phk@localhost) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 07T6QgW6081999; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 06:26:42 GMT (envelope-from phk) To: Rick Macklem cc: "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD have an assigned Internet OID? In-reply-to: From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: , <40659.1598591955@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <81997.1598682402.1@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 06:26:42 +0000 Message-ID: <81998.1598682402@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BdmhW62Bdz41Fp X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.42 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[phk]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.dk]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.983]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.46)[-0.456]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.980]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[phk@phk.freebsd.dk,phk@critter.freebsd.dk]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1835, ipnet:130.225.0.0/16, country:EU]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[phk@phk.freebsd.dk,phk@critter.freebsd.dk]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 06:26:53 -0000 -------- Rick Macklem writes: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Is https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26225 > sufficient to allow me to use 1.3.6.1.4.1.2238.1.1.1 for a user@domain > name in this otherName component of subjAltName in the X.509 cert? > (I didn't list the UserName as the first item of the subtree. Should I?) You should add a comment about how suballocations (if allowed) happens under that branch. > Do I need to update the date/time for LAST-UPDATED and REVISION > when I commit it, I'd guess? Yes please. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.