From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Mar 13 22:36:52 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-239.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.239])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C56237B41B
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:36:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CF5AC66C76; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:36:47 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:36:47 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: John Indra <maverick@office.naver.co.id>
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Subject: Re: malloc() and the stock Perl in -CURRENT (and -STABLE)
Message-ID: <20020313223647.A20636@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20020314104525.B8244@office.naver.co.id> <20020314052810.GH74829@elvis.mu.org> <20020314124729.E8244@office.naver.co.id>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20020314124729.E8244@office.naver.co.id>; from maverick@office.naver.co.id on Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:47:29PM +0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:47:29PM +0700, John Indra wrote:

> And to clarify things... I don't know what's wrong with malloc() in -CURRENT
> and -STABLE (and I don't even know whether it's even "wrong"). All I want is
> to let the Perl maintainer in -CURRENT and -STABLE to compile the stock Perl
> with its own malloc library, thus Perl in FreeBSD doesn't suffer from this
> kind of slowness.

phkmalloc is generally pretty efficient..how do you know that
switching to the perl internal malloc to optimize this particular
usage pattern won't severely pessimize others?

Kris

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8kET/Wry0BWjoQKURAgIYAKCTwtsMlseJ0FL57eDCnq8N8l7jYgCg6XW2
/OLpDPABlXXnpcbV28nwlVc=
=3qcR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message