From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 23 15:35:17 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BC3D7F;
 Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:35:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jiashiun@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22f.google.com (mail-oa0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCAC124D9;
 Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m1so1711855oag.34
 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 08:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=Dl3ew/qWIkNssY/tnrsJaeZh+kDOYfA3U7CcUKW1AW8=;
 b=w6E07htIMtGlUHj1NASNTwHDIZbGYAMcoH66lHKhal8pFTVYUORZeQdFXRMPhldK0U
 Polwd/mkU7BF0tiRZ5rpkskOyrWjBVEW1j/tAF3vpSnbHYNG1N8vmUJHAZg7JVfZhipl
 X8NarbUpbdh8wOoIHAq9bZk1aRJ+Q0VTq/ZnS7xjvpeSGeo6rNbyuj5i7A/+EEigX/a5
 3IEdIe4YJXxILf5Pj8BaJrVRJi9l9WnOger+Y71p1xZAIllx9JVA+bHIynhswSkTsqIS
 lxuF1jWGb5a/BHkWh1nZmCG9/Oto5/6/zyJOQUcNlGvKQ5emL3Mg37/natAIr1dZHim9
 MFVw==
X-Received: by 10.60.45.38 with SMTP id j6mr31218522oem.56.1374593716248; Tue,
 23 Jul 2013 08:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.130.204 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 08:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHNYxxM++gCFS=H+vc6hWYPXkYBp+w29cwL_zdHTVjU824_w_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=Ln7f9tWt=OqZa9eZ-ZAVBfQSC-y_=8c-6zwAd@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110129084125.GA54969@freebsd.org>
 <CAHNYxxPZMUMDMBo0tRSSjJZWqDD7BNR7BdadcVfZk5nDHS2c1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHNYxxOCDMzumJS9S9=tmrwdjunrp6wsH5TOgLO6EEU9OAkhaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130108150155.GF82219@kib.kiev.ua>
 <CAHNYxxM++gCFS=H+vc6hWYPXkYBp+w29cwL_zdHTVjU824_w_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jia-Shiun Li <jiashiun@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:34:46 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHNYxxP6OAov7qsVTeRam3_R9hTzkPsPo3Y4+CO4cwR0pXgcBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: cpufreq not working as module on i386/amd64
To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:35:17 -0000

On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jia-Shiun Li <jiashiun@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok anyone can help test and review this patch?
>
> It will allow cpufreq to be removed from kernel conf, loaded and
> function correctly as kernel module. I've tested it ok on my own
> i5-3450.
>
> It removes get_features method definition from acpi_if.m and
> corresponding implementations from est, p4tcc, & hwpstate. Feature
> flags are set directly in acpi_cpu.c omitting previous procedure of
> querying cpufreq drivers.
>

I submitted the patch as PR kern/180588. Could anyone help review and
get this committed?

Thanks,
Jia-Shiun.