From owner-freebsd-mobile Sun Nov 2 11:28:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA07864 for mobile-outgoing; Sun, 2 Nov 1997 11:28:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile) Received: from gvr.gvr.org (root@gvr.gvr.org [194.151.74.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA07854 for ; Sun, 2 Nov 1997 11:28:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from guido@gvr.org) Received: (from guido@localhost) by gvr.gvr.org (8.8.6/8.8.5) id UAA05665; Sun, 2 Nov 1997 20:28:40 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij Message-Id: <199711021928.UAA05665@gvr.gvr.org> Subject: Re: problems after PAO -> 2.2.5 stable In-Reply-To: <199711021913.MAA03336@rocky.mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Nov 2, 97 12:13:11 pm" To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 20:28:40 +0100 (MET) Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Nate Williams wrote: > > > > I did that change and it worked. Perhaps it would even be better > > > > to be able to configure the irq the pcic will be using. > > > > > > This is the best solution, but there's no easy solution to implementing > > > it. If you can come up with one I'm all ears/eyes. > > > > Yeah..I've looked at the way it is doen now and it isn't quite easy. > > Right now assigning an IRQ to a device == claiming it's an ISA device. > Why? We could try to assign te irq we want and just fail if it does not work. I do agree it is not as clean as possible, but then again: this is to avoid breakage ;-) > > Anyway, we could introduce an option so at least we can do both ;-) > > Options are evil. :) Bugs are worse. -Guido