From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 27 19:03:31 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id TAA19589 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 19:03:31 -0700 Received: from white.dogwood.com (white.dogwood.com [140.174.96.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA19570 ; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 19:03:19 -0700 Received: (from dave@localhost) by white.dogwood.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id TAA29573; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 19:02:47 -0700 From: Dave Cornejo Message-Id: <199507280202.TAA29573@white.dogwood.com> Subject: Re: New 2.1.0-950726-SNAP available - come 'n get it! To: iidpwr@lightlink.satcom.net (Imperial Irrigation District) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 19:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, announce@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199507280037.RAA16483@lightlink.satcom.net> from "Imperial Irrigation District" at Jul 27, 95 05:37:28 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 544 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Imperial Irrigation District wrote: > Could anybody tell me what is new on 2.1, which 2.0.5 and 2.0 doesn't > have? Yeah, it's got a '1' instead of a '0.5' - It has fewer digits, so it's probably not as good. Personally, I'm holding out for 2.1.1 or 2.1.1.5, which Jordan will probably have up for FTP before most of us have finished FTP'ing 2.1. So when can we expect 2.2? -- Dave Cornejo There is nothing so subtle Dogwood Media as the obvious Fremont, California