Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:28:31 +1030 From: "Paul A. Hoadley" <paulh@logicsquad.net> To: Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The only worthwhile logo-related comments so far.... Message-ID: <20050213055831.GB8532@grover.logicsquad.net> In-Reply-To: <420EE518.9070605@pacific.net.sg> References: <20050213004204.GA91920@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050213021055.69766.qmail@web53901.mail.yahoo.com> <20050213022605.GA24426@xor.obsecurity.org> <420ED112.80401@pacific.net.sg> <420EDF52.1090408@nbritton.org> <420EE518.9070605@pacific.net.sg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:26:48PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > >Also remember that the community (committers) voted them into > >"office" to represent and make decisions for us. > > Do not get me wrong here. I do not think that this is bad. > > I think that this is the reason for the acceptance as it is by > companies. > > No matter what FreeBSD will do, companies will not accept FreeBSD > more as long as this structure stays like this. What makes you draw this conclusion? --=20 Paul. w http://logicsquad.net/ h http://paul.hoadley.name/ --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCDuyH730Z/jysbzIRAjarAJ9XNclICllGj2jZddfoj8ATUuF+SgCfY5UF ARsi5kwViHo209XD7c1rpOw= =pzkZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050213055831.GB8532>