From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Nov 3 12: 5:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (bachue.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC1315738 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 1999 12:05:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co ([168.176.3.38]) by bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA3904 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 1999 14:04:08 -0500 Message-ID: <38209354.5A0E1416@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 14:56:04 -0500 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: Universidad Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: it,es-CO MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Possible change in the Qt port. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, Some of you probably know that KDE2 will be covered by an artistic license; if you didn't, well... I heard it in the kde-license list. Anyway, building my first Qt-related port, I ended discussing with Imura-san a change in Qt2. Since many ports seem to like having a QTDIR, I suggested that we should install all Qt under $(PREFIX)/lib/qt/, this way we will be consistent with what the rest of the world expects without disagreeing with FreeBSD's hier(7). I think the Qt1 port should stay where it is now, and that this change should apply from Qt2 (onwards) in order to avoid excessive port breakage and a general mess(tm). Any comments, suggestions, or disagreements? cheers, Pedro. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message