From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 18 00:20:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250B616B352 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 00:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5811A43D5A for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 00:20:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 42618 invoked from network); 18 May 2006 00:20:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=j9tW3Djvy7xzpL6610IBwCR9xweqa2ds9ZZ8Ibucigypks2ioN0a1iEsp5WEgqGeFxep+fCoks91hU9FIZ/0/kA6N3Mz51KB5dPq5PnS8NQpk/WOlWtnwdgY/eH7Iea3BXY1YLTpGLs9fSUiqwcijAmqJa6488dj9G1JWfUS6Fg= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 May 2006 00:20:34 -0000 Message-ID: <446BBDDC.5010702@rogers.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:20:44 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kirkwood References: <446AC35C.2090304@paradise.net.nz> <446BBC75.6040407@paradise.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <446BBC75.6040407@paradise.net.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sequantial IO Performance improvement in 6.1-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 00:20:37 -0000 Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> I recently upgraded my FreeBSD machines from 6.0R to 6.1-STABLE >> >> I noticed a pleasant surprise - improved disk IO! >> >> In 6.0R best sequential throughput I ever saw was 170 MB/s (32k block >> size reads on an 4G file). In 6.1-STABLE I'm seeing 190 Mb/s (32k >> block size reads on an 4G file). >> > > Would have been even better if I'd spelled "sequential" correctly in > the subject :-(... > > I'm also seeing sequential write speed increasing from 120Mb/s to > 140Mb/s. > > I did wonder if this increased IO throughput is what is triggering the > posts about data corruption in 6.1 - i.e. more throughput means more > heat to dissipate! Or, maybe the file was in a different location on the disk. Outer and inner tracks perform differently. Did you test with the same exact file and the same file system?