From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Mar 30  8: 3:41 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from guild.plethora.net (guild.plethora.net [205.166.146.8])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD2737B71A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:03:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from seebs@guild.plethora.net)
Received: from guild.plethora.net (seebs@localhost.plethora.net [127.0.0.1])
	by guild.plethora.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f2UG2vK00500;
	Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:02:57 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <200103301602.f2UG2vK00500@guild.plethora.net>
From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach)
Reply-To: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach)
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: Todd Whitesel <toddpw@best.com>, tech-kern@netbsd.org,
	freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:50:25 PST."
             <20010329235022.W9431@fw.wintelcom.net> 
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:02:56 -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <20010329235022.W9431@fw.wintelcom.net>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>* Peter Seebach <seebs@plethora.net> [010329 23:49] wrote:
>> The only portable solution is the new feature in C99.

>Which new feature?

C99 allows the last member of a struct to be declared as an array with no
size; this implies an object which will act like an array, but which isn't
directly bounds-checked.

-s

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message