From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 15:07:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D669A16A4CE; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:07:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EED143D48; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:07:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.kitchenlab.org) Received: from intruder.kitchenlab.org (adsl-64-142-31-106.sonic.net [64.142.31.106]) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i0FN7tts013477 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:07:56 -0800 Received: from intruder.kitchenlab.org (bmah@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0FN7spW039480; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:07:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.kitchenlab.org) Message-Id: <200401152307.i0FN7spW039480@intruder.kitchenlab.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: References: Comments: In-reply-to Robert Watson message dated "Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:04:59 -0500." From: "Bruce A. Mah" X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-91939202P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:07:54 -0800 Sender: bmah@intruder.kitchenlab.org cc: Matt Freitag cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.1->5.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bmah@freebsd.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 23:08:00 -0000 --==_Exmh_-91939202P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Matt Freitag wrote: > > > Building 5.2-RELEASE from 5.1-RELEASE-p10 w/ipf+ipfw+ipfw6+dummynet, 5.1 > > Compiled fine with this setup. I need ipfilter as it's doing my source > > routing for ipv6 (multiple transits) since ip6fw doesn't support fwd. (I > > just use ip6fw for filtering, and ipf for forwarding to the correct > > interface according to source) Am I just being stupid here somehow? > > IPFILTER now relies on the PFIL_HOOKS kernel option; this is something > that is somewhat poorly documented, and we should add it to the errate I > suspect. It's in the release notes and in UPDATING...I have the feeling that if people won't read it in either of those two places, they won't read it in the errata either. :-p Enabling the options IPFILTER feature also requires enabling options PFIL_HOOKS. Bruce. --==_Exmh_-91939202P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 iD8DBQFABx1K2MoxcVugUsMRAtplAKCX6hP1FGEm904kkaXG/7OsPf0tIwCfZEkA xYuPswCGmgdsf13HRXL85Qw= =ani6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-91939202P--