From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Jul 31 02:24:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA17610
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 02:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA17580;
          Wed, 31 Jul 1996 02:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id BAA01204
          ; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 01:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id BAA19917; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 01:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 01:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199607310835.BAA19917@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG
CC: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu, lchamber@ec.camitel.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <10202.838792606@orion.webspan.net> (gpalmer@freebsd.org)
Subject: Re: xemacs package depends on Motif (was Re: your mail )
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Actually, I think he did ... I just pulled the package and got a
 * dependancy on libXm.so.2.0 too :-( I guess the port somehow picked up
 * on us having Motif on the compile machine, even tho it shouldn't have
 * :-( ARGH

Actually, it's understandable, as both thud (building
packages-current) admin1 (building packages-2.1.5) have Motif for
building Motif ports.

Should we disable the Motif detection?  That might make the people who
own Motif unhappy....

Argh.  I hate Motif. :(

Satoshi