From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 23:05:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2954137B401; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03.attbi.com [204.127.202.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5098343FAF; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:05:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org (12-232-168-4.client.attbi.com[12.232.168.4]) by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03) with ESMTP id <2003040706055500300p5a3ve>; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 06:05:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA58060; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:05:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:05:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030406.221733.12213570.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG cc: core@FreeBSD.ORG cc: davidxu@FreeBSD.ORG cc: eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com Subject: Re: KSE signals broken by 1:1 commit. X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:05:58 -0000 On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > Julian, > > thanks for your message to core, but despite the included > text, it is unclear what you want to do. Do you want a blank check to > break things, or do is there a specific fix that was referred to > elsewhere in the thread that was absent from the quoted material. > > Warner > We are in a bind.. Jeff has committed changes that have broken the KSE view of signals. however he is out of the picture for a week now. This means that we can not pass our changes past him as we try fix it. This is made more difficult because it appears that 1:1 threads is broken at the moment, (see mail comments in -current), so we can not test our changes against the 1:1 threads code. All I want is a comment that assuming we take care, if jeff gets back and finds that we've broken something for him, that we are not nailed to a tree for it. julian