From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Jun 16 21:38:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37770335C7C for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.kotowski@a9development.com) Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch (mail-40134.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "SwissSign Server Gold CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49mhQr29Wmz3XQt for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:38:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.kotowski@a9development.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:38:34 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a9development.com; s=protonmail; t=1592343521; bh=EfFBEDArkGWxNcPAQMLnuUHAJ+R31tHhx0uZlUAIkzg=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vJfqTWbMtzho0uy5hSQX8iPfv1NI/q/lGaNQHLhqBOSq8wNdjHRhLFqDkhxa/uRsj R61jMo2ioZtgpQAFlkO3oxJEcAumNnFA/PI4WMyF54sW1t1MDENWsuSHN/UtRXhNep oJWeTe9GQMUTUt5ImPT0Lk+4CW2aX/G7wrPqYKTA= To: Dan Kotowski From: Dan Kotowski Cc: "greg@unrelenting.technology" , freebsd-arm Reply-To: Dan Kotowski Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Layerscape/QorIQ LX2160X Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <32d1c173d986884efb9b28932c0ead52@unrelenting.technology> <5e1b4bfe845e62bbcd8b827fa37f2b98@unrelenting.technology> <940a6099e971e01bd6d04564d0982b9d@unrelenting.technology> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mail.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49mhQr29Wmz3XQt X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=a9development.com header.s=protonmail header.b=vJfqTWbM; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=a9development.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dan.kotowski@a9development.com designates 185.70.40.134 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dan.kotowski@a9development.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.52 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[dan.kotowski@a9development.com]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[a9development.com:s=protonmail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.70.40.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.982]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[185.70.40.134:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[a9development.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[a9development.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.46)[-0.458]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.979]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[185.70.40.134:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:38:45 -0000 > AHCI is looking better and better! > I'm going to do a little bit of poking at that > SATA HDD just to see how stable it really is. Well, it's definitely stable enough for lab use, that's a bonus. I caused m= yself a few headaches by doing stupid things that caused a series of panics= , but all are easily attributed to human errata... Oddly the i2c bus is gone - any ideas what we changed that caused it to dis= appear? https://gist.github.com/agrajag9/03d9f2f52084ef0ae1e64cbba190e062 If I'm reading the DSDT correctly, then it should be hanging right off acpi= 0. We can even see it in an older dmesg.boot: i2c0: iomem 0x2000000-0x200f= fff irq 7 on acpi0 But now, nothing... Aside - since the builtin netifs are basically useless for us, any suggesti= ons on USB wifi dongles? I tried a few from my parts piles, but all of them= were unstable Realtek trash. I know Atheros chips are usually a good bet i= n Linux land - does that hold true in FreeBSD as well?