From owner-freebsd-isp  Tue Feb 18 17:44:39 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA20135
          for isp-outgoing; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 17:44:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from excel.tnet.com.au (excel.tnet.com.au [203.15.94.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA20129
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 17:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from slaterm@localhost) by excel.tnet.com.au (8.7.4/8.7.3) id JAA02569; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 09:49:28 +0800
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 09:49:27 +0800 (WST)
From: Michael Slater <slaterm@excel.tnet.com.au>
To: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com>
cc: Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com>, Ron Bickers <rbickers@intercenter.net>,
        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Apache Virtual Servers (single IP) 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970218170829.8975A-100000@harlie>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970219094555.2286C-100000@excel.tnet.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



> > > Just like the clueless ISPs that went to dynamic IP addresses for 
What's clueless about ISP's that use dynamic IP's ? Are they  
"clueless" because they dont do it the way you do it ?