From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 17 12:09:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A9716A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:09:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kweetal.tue.nl (kweetal.tue.nl [131.155.3.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB8643D2D for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:08:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from f.nossin@student.tue.nl) Received: by kweetal.tue.nl (Postfix, from userid 40) id BB5B013B7B0; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:08:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from pcwin502 (dyn414.win.tue.nl [131.155.70.117]) by kweetal.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EBE13B611 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:08:54 +0100 (CET) From: "Freek Nossin" To: Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:08:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcT8jVBWvzs4Pz8/RyyRegRxNaz0Nw== Message-Id: <20050117120854.56EBE13B611@kweetal.tue.nl> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on kweetal.tue.nl X-Spam-DCC: dmv.com: kweetal.tue.nl 1181; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Level: Subject: bandwidthd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:09:00 -0000 Hello, I use a program called bandwidthd to monitor my internet traffic. I've configured the program in such a way that I can see how much data traffic is used by which ip (at what time of day) for several intervals of time (current day, week and year). Bandwidthd gives nice results and statistics, however it crashes very often. Furthermore it is not updated very often so waiting for an update could take forever. Two thinks might help me out - someone has experience with bandwidthd and found the same bug with a solution for it - or I look for another program in the ports tree with similar functionality (but which one...) Probably it will come down to the second solution. Does someone has any suggestions? Thanks! Freek