From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 15 17:18: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net (maynard.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.243]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAB937B95B for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 17:17:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stuyman@confusion.net) Received: from confusion.net (user-2ive70t.dialup.mindspring.com [165.247.28.29]) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA22510; Mon, 15 May 2000 20:17:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <39209318.65CF0A04@confusion.net> Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 20:15:20 -0400 From: Laurence Berland Organization: B.R.A.T.T. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Fedde Cc: Harry Putnam , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unix Virus.. Old but Nasty References: <200005150432.e4F4WgD16543@fedde.littleton.co.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My shell of choice is tcsh, which is part of the reason why my root will always have the shell as plain old sh. I find it discourages me from doing anything as root that doesn't absolutely need to be done as root. I never do change it, but someone might want to. Although this may not be the best idea I still think it's important to inform them that last I checked it was safe as far as boot -s was concerned. As I'm still running 3.x, not 4.0, I'm not sure if such is still the case. I'm still curious if the behavior is the same as it used to be. Laurence Chris Fedde wrote: > > On 14 May 2000 18:29:07 -0700 Harry Putnam wrote: > +------------------ > | Laurence Berland writes: > | > | > Last I checked if you just change the root shell to bash it will do what > | > you want. FreeBSD should prompt for the root shell when you boot up in > | > single user anyway, so you can just tell it /bin/sh or /bin/csh then. > | > | If you set bash as root shell, at least for me, it breaks if you have > | to login from an emergency `boot -s' because some of the libraries or > | something that bash uses are not on the "/" root partition. > +------------------ > > Please, just let the root account alone. It is far better to > install and use something like sudo(8) than it is to muck about with > the shell for the root user. If you find that you are logging > in as root for extended sessions then you should re-think some of > your admin habits. > > If you need an sh root login then just use the toor account that is > already there. If you realy need bash then just start it once you login. > > chris > > -- > Chris Fedde > 303 773 9134 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- Laurence Berland, Stuyvesant HS Debate <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. http://stuy.debate.net icq #7434346 aol imer E1101 The above email Copyright (C) 2000 Laurence Berland All rights reserved To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message