Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 06:40:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa <root@pukruppa.de> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Splash screen votes Message-ID: <20040918063655.G853@pukruppa.net> In-Reply-To: <1095479569.92002.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <1095468373.92002.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1095479569.92002.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 23:51, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: >> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> >>> I've been trying to capture the votes for the GNOME 2.8 splash screen, >>> and here is our standings thus far: >>> >>> 1. http://www.marcuscom.com/gnome28/gnome28-splash-freebsd-grey.png >>> 2. http://www.marcuscom.com/gnome28/gnome28-splash-freebsd-red.png >>> 3. http://spekt.net/~raadradd/gnome/fbsd-gnome28-radek.png >>> 4. Current splash screen >>> >>> I've tried to remain neutral in all of this, but if I had to weigh in, I >>> would vote for http://spekt.net/~raadradd/gnome/fbsd-gnome28-radek.png. >>> However, in this case, one vote isn't enough to move it up to the #2 >>> position. So unless there are anymore votes, it looks like the grey >>> splash will win out. >> Perhaps fbsd-gnome28-radek.png - which was my favourite, too - >> can be changed to gnome2.9 ? >> We will be seeing this longer than 2.8, won't we? > > GNOME 2.9 will be the development branch for 2.10. If you don't track > development branches, you won't see GNOME 2.9 at all. I am tracking the development branch, so I saw 2.7 longer than 2.6 . As you remember you started 2.7 two or three weeks after 2.6 was released. Uli. > > Joe > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040918063655.G853>