Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:32:13 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 238773] multimedia/x265: Only highest bit-depth profile is built when multiple (bit-depth OPTIONS) are selected
Message-ID:  <bug-238773-7788-xGVFcRMOvs@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-238773-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-238773-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238773

Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #210581|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #20 from Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> ---
Created attachment 210907
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D210907&action=
=3Dedit
Bundle multiple pixel-widths

> The "promised behavior" was never correct. It implied 8 bit build,
> along with optional 10bit and 12bit.

The promise was correct -- we just never delivered on it. The attached vers=
ion
always builds the 8bit version, plus 10- and/or 12-bit versions if requeste=
d.

The libhdr10plus is also always built now. When debugging is enabled, nasm =
is
invoked with "-g -O0" as well.

Things yet to be determined:

 1. On my machine the test executable still crashes as discussed earlier.
 2. Should the highest bit-width be the default -- to match the current sta=
te
of affairs?
 3. Should it be possible to build ONLY one or both high-bit versions --
without the 8-bit variant?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-238773-7788-xGVFcRMOvs>