Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:32:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238773] multimedia/x265: Only highest bit-depth profile is built when multiple (bit-depth OPTIONS) are selected Message-ID: <bug-238773-7788-xGVFcRMOvs@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-238773-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-238773-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238773 Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #210581|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #20 from Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> --- Created attachment 210907 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D210907&action= =3Dedit Bundle multiple pixel-widths > The "promised behavior" was never correct. It implied 8 bit build, > along with optional 10bit and 12bit. The promise was correct -- we just never delivered on it. The attached vers= ion always builds the 8bit version, plus 10- and/or 12-bit versions if requeste= d. The libhdr10plus is also always built now. When debugging is enabled, nasm = is invoked with "-g -O0" as well. Things yet to be determined: 1. On my machine the test executable still crashes as discussed earlier. 2. Should the highest bit-width be the default -- to match the current sta= te of affairs? 3. Should it be possible to build ONLY one or both high-bit versions -- without the 8-bit variant? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-238773-7788-xGVFcRMOvs>