From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 19 01:17:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BCB16A4CF for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:17:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50ADE43D53 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:17:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill.coffman@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c16so55299rne for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:17:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ZcglZ0DuWV51JS5lucDIJ214mLFde/wMFtM9Jj/3jr3HxgOkr/Um9As2sN7EMV4t2QqoEcU8pa2i5FmL86jHZ8DBVwj5cs5HzPu3FiAS68o2v807/y1Zod33QXTCt8t/ItUAv/QPMzWndLUWW584jPZ7jSS3Vqt1qPrCvmpVPus= Received: by 10.38.151.26 with SMTP id y26mr136910rnd; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:17:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.125.27 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:17:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6f9c15f805011817175e3e821@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:17:46 -0800 From: Bill Coffman To: Alex Dupre In-Reply-To: <41ED88C0.1090805@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6f9c15f8050118105132e37e02@mail.gmail.com> <41ED88C0.1090805@FreeBSD.org> cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bill Coffman List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:17:48 -0000 Thanks for the info. Since we're on the subject, I was wondering about other conventions for port versions. Sometimes it's "_1" or "_2" and sometimes it's like "p5-DBD-mysql40-2.9004_1". Is there any reason for all these, or are they just left to the variable discretion of the port maintainer? Thanks, -Bill On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:08:00 +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: > Bill Coffman wrote: > > My friend, who is an expert in Linux, but not FreeBSD, told me that > > the "a" meant that this is alpha code. Is this correct? Seems wrong > > to me. > > It is wrong. In MySQL case an appended "a" means that the tarball has > been repackaged to fix a small bug in release (and 4.1 serie is > production quality. > > -- > Alex Dupre >