From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 11 14:56:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01C83DD; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.made4.biz (mail.made4.biz [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:c018::1:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 707D9822; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 2a02-8428-011b-e000-0290-f5ff-fe9d-b78c.rev.sfr.net ([2a02:8428:11b:e000:290:f5ff:fe9d:b78c] helo=magellan.dumbbell.fr) by mail.made4.biz with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.83 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XS5nc-000814-5m; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:56:40 +0200 Message-ID: <5411B823.7060504@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:56:35 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Tw6liYXN0aWVuIFDDqWRyb24=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Maste Subject: Re: UEFI boot failure: BIOS smap did not include a basemem segment! References: <54109FC4.70105@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ICOGJgskeGOi3C4sCGp8Jg2VEaB2FobtB" Cc: FreeBSD Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:56:42 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ICOGJgskeGOi3C4sCGp8Jg2VEaB2FobtB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11.09.2014 16:12, Ed Maste wrote: > The requirement for a usable memory range with physaddr 0 doesn't hold > for UEFI, and the md startup hasn't yet been reworked to accommodate > that. Thank you for the explanation! > Do you mind submitting a PR to keep track of this issue? Here it is: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D193564 --=20 Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron --ICOGJgskeGOi3C4sCGp8Jg2VEaB2FobtB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUEbgoXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NzA4N0ZEMUFFQUUwRTEyREJDNkE2RjAz OUU5OTc2MUE1RkQ5NENDAAoJEDnpl2Gl/ZTMBcEP/iuv99vHcbwhQrle1elnzTZp +mBRZd0UlluC2qhSALn/x8IZ5aXn4psdDgrzVByEoov1DGbYwWnNYkPo+PqH+ypq otOB8rFm3rJ69WvYQOjvdvLkwNM6Iuz6hGFghYGajKVyNIBp3JhxHvs+TYLL91UT j5IRnO+DjSgmYAJxmiWdMYBCeB1hHM8G4CdAtwScLmlSLY8RNDiqqHikRPClsZT3 Fe+HVDJi6F1qMaUeNmJUHuafoFysSy5NcAxQ+rjEuC3QlILIU38s5M7kszOoqhYo L78xGvQHOlWVmNdWUli/Do43ccfG6Nbq/foAgcf3hhrjHd4vOOmO3LUYAX1pigtK 69c0FX6tASPyB+23ApvPYg0inaeEBWlN+C+HwC9SX68rTanJHvmk2rRKHXUsfrXH chUcUuRzIEpz1G+fZmQjabLig6fyoNe7M8/5hFA0282D3+50mYfEwpFPEvtS1Y7q zRc7xe1ORps36dtBQzqrN5Hb5KgJUq2SOdYThZ9EApWal1Qrx1TQmGZy5RGmMMPQ vMq/R4O6Jhtbl1an24U9ZKoBnjR38RLCyE+4d9GNZvpst9xFYx+ZBGRVtwYLjJs6 /8NuSguw5Tb+NwnEDenwT6ptuA1TfvFHGYiyRL4czQrlfYC/InD03omL5o7CE14C S3pmVCjTmG5AuqDama58 =bc0T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ICOGJgskeGOi3C4sCGp8Jg2VEaB2FobtB--