From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Tue Jul 21 14:18:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C409A5FF0 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:18:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5A821A5F for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:18:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t6LEIgHI077551 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:18:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 198705] [new port] www/httpd: OpenBSD http daemon Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:18:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:18:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198705 --- Comment #5 from Chris Hutchinson --- (In reply to Nikola Kolev from comment #4) > /usr/ports/mail/spamd uses obspamd as name because of spamassasin. obhttpd > is also an option. Changing binary name is simple and for me it is not > important what will be the name. > /usr/ports/www/xshttpd uses httpd and httpd.conf manual pages and it is in > conflict with the current port. Probably renaming the manual pages of the > current port? Edit manual pages to use new name convention? Suggestions? I > prefer minimal changes from the upstream. In the end, it should be what *you* want. You're the proposed maintainer. :) I only suggested ohttpd, because openbsd-httpd seemed unnecessarily long, and of course, httpd had already been taken (Apache). Maybe obhttpd should be the standard "convention" -- meaning ob = OpenBSD Fewer letters to fool with when making the necessary changes (binary/man pages). Honestly, I'm happy with whatever you choose. I only suggested ohttpd because it was close to what most people associate with an HTTPd server, and there are less letters to (mis)type. :) All the best to you. I'm looking forward to this getting into the ports tree. Thanks! --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.