From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 17 20:49:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26231106566C; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE7B8FC1A; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 987EA46B06; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:49:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CFBC78A021; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:49:16 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:21:40 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-CBSD-20100120; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201002171321.40732.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:49:16 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: Roy Nicholson , doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error in developer handbook? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:49:18 -0000 On Thursday 11 February 2010 11:10:53 am Roy Nicholson wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking at the Developer's Handbook (which I think is great btw) and noticed on http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/x86-system- calls.html, its says to use "brandelf -f Linux filename" to change an ELF binary. Shouldn't this be "brandelf -t Linux filename"? > > Looking at the brandelf man page it shows the same syntax using -t vs. -f. Fixed, thanks! -- John Baldwin