From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 26 10: 6: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from hawaii.conterra.com (hawaii.conterra.com [209.12.164.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BE014E70 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 10:05:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from myself@conterra.com) Received: from dmaddox.conterra.com (root@dmaddox.conterra.com [209.12.169.48]) by hawaii.conterra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA04685; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:05:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from myself@localhost) by dmaddox.conterra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA00634; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:05:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from myself) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:05:46 -0400 From: "Donald J . Maddox" To: Ollivier Robert Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp Message-ID: <19990926130546.A548@dmaddox.conterra.com> Reply-To: dmaddox@conterra.com References: <19990926034143.A510@dmaddox.conterra.com> <19990926125858.A18948@keltia.freenix.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: <19990926125858.A18948@keltia.freenix.fr> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The whole point is that I want to be able to use the wavetable synthesis features of the card. Newpcm (or oldpcm, for that matter) provides NO support for the AWE device whatsoever, as you can see from your dmesg below. It makes little sense to me that PnP functionality should be tied down to a particular audio driver. Obviously, the newpnp code is not as versatile as the oldpnp code was, because the oldpnp code worked with my card regardless of whether I used snd or pcm. I'm just suggesting here that it would be nice if the authors of this code would make it _equally functional_ to what was removed. It's not nice to remove functionality unconditionally and then provide no replacement at all... On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 12:58:58PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > Can you try to new newpcm ? > > controller pnp0 > device pcm0 > > > The first 2 lines have always been unnecessary, but harmless; however, the > > 3rd line is _absolutely necessary_ to get the AWE to probe. > > The above works for my AWE64. > > pcm0: at port 0x220-0x22f,0x330-0x331,0x388-0x38b irq 5 drq 1,5 on isa0 > unknown0: at port 0x200-0x207 on isa0 > unknown1: at port 0x620-0x623 on isa0 > > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Sep 9 1999 00:19:32 > Installed devices: > pcm0: at io 0x220 irq 5 drq 1:5 (1/1 channels duplex) > > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr > FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #74: Thu Sep 9 00:20:51 CEST 1999 > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message