From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 13 17:24:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C42A37B401 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from geddar.km.ua (geddar.km.ua [62.149.0.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8184143FAF for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:24:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from maxim@geddar.km.ua) Received: from geddar.km.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by geddar.km.ua (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5E0OUMW091258; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 03:24:30 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from maxim@geddar.km.ua) Received: (from maxim@localhost) by geddar.km.ua (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5E0OTu4091257; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 03:24:29 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 03:24:29 +0300 From: Maxim Mazurok To: ticso@cicely.de Message-ID: <20030614002429.GN338@km.ua> References: <20030613210519.GH338@km.ua> <20030613224912.GB7279@cicely8.cicely.de> <20030613225959.GI338@km.ua> <20030613230232.GJ338@km.ua> <20030613232116.GC7279@cicely8.cicely.de> <20030613233057.GM338@km.ua> <20030613235336.GF7279@cicely8.cicely.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030613235336.GF7279@cicely8.cicely.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: additional com-port X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 00:24:38 -0000 On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:53:37AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: >> >What is wrong with the second onboard serial? >> >You just have to remove the flags which declare it to be a special >> >debug interface for to kernel. >> >See sio(4) manpage for details on flags. >> >> hmmm >> sio2 - it's no traditional com-port >> it's ISA Cisco router console (cisco AP-EC) >> i no need second onboard com-port, but i need access to cisco console > >And you can't just give it another IRQ? in SRM for onboard ports? >Cisco should know that IRQ 3 and 4 are typically in use. only 3 and 4. no else. >> if i deactivated sio1 in SRM, change settings of cisco console to IO_COM2 >> and irq 3, can i use next kernel config for worked serial console to freebsd >> and worked console to cisco: >> >> device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 irq 4 >> device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3 >> ? > >Yes - that should work. > >> and one more: now console to server connected to second com-port on >> board(upper). it's right? > >Sorry - I can't follow you here. >The console is always on sio0, which is the upper one on PC164, so >I asume it's also upper on PC164SX. >The lower port needs to be disabled so you can reuse it's IRQ. tnx! -- Maxim Mazurok (MMP2-RIPE)