From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jun 19 00:58:39 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA01988
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:58:39 -0700
Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA01982
          ; Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:58:36 -0700
Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id AAA00671; Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:58:00 -0700
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Message-Id: <199506190758.AAA00671@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Subject: Re: Crypto moves - ome more question.
To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray)
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu, gibbs@freefall.cdrom.com,
        current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199506190643.IAA27634@grumble.grondar.za> from "Mark Murray" at Jun 19, 95 08:43:11 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 802       
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> As the concensus is now that the DES library should move out of eBones
> and into secure, where is a decent place to put the header file(s). At
> the moment there is only one, des.h, and that is installed into
> /usr/include/kerberosIV - not a good idea anymore. Also, if I include
> more of Eric Young's crypto code, their headers should go in the same
> place. What is good?
> 
> Eric's full-blown library (SSLeay) is called libcrypto. So how about 
> /usr/include/crypto? Or just bunging it into /usr/include?

Do any of the programming standards (Posix, ANSI, XP4G, etc) say anything
about where the headers for these functions belong??


-- 
Rod Grimes                                      rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation Company                   Custom computers for FreeBSD