From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 6 18:13:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A311E16A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:13:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from avs3.arnes.si (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC27743D5E for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:13:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) by avs3.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C291D79D3; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:13:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from avs3.arnes.si ([193.2.1.68]) by localhost (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99732-10; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:13:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from clj8-144.dial-up.arnes.si (clj8-144.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.52.144]) by avs3.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34AF1D79B8; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:13:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Dejan Lesjak To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:13:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200407051055.i65AtAbD023877@robert2.mpe-garching.mpg.de> <200407052327.04593.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200407062013.36333.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q: state of the X (as related to fbsd). X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 18:13:39 -0000 On Tuesday 06 of July 2004 17:59, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Dejan Lesjak writes: > > The patch for xdm should be there when XFree86 ports are upgraded to 4.= 4. > > AFAIK, only X.org had the xdm bug; at least, the version of XFree86 we > currently have in ports does not seem to have it. I tested both > before the vulnerability was publicized. > > DES The version that is currently in ports shouldn't have it, the XFree86 4.4=20 version, however does and the patch should be there with upgraded ports. Dejan