From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Nov 13 2:55:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from arnold.neland.dk (mail.neland.dk [194.255.12.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB89615133 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 1999 02:55:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leif@neland.dk) Received: from gina (gina.neland.dk [192.168.0.14]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA39281 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 1999 11:55:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from leif@neland.dk) Message-ID: <009c01bf2dc5$ad750d80$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> From: "Leif Neland" To: Subject: wasting ip's on dedicated lines Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 11:55:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We're going to connect several sites througg dedicated lines: Our site | =20 router 100.100.100.1/24 (cisco 2600, channelized E1 (soon)) modem | telco lines modem router 100.100.101.1/30 (cisco 1005) | =20 Fbsd firewall/proxy outside 100.100.101.2/30 | inside 192.168.0.1/30 =20 This means I'll use 4 ip's for each remote site on the cable between = router and firewall:=20 100.100.101.0: network 100.100.101.1: cisco 100.100.101.2: firewall 100.100.101.3: broadcast Next site will use 100.100.101.4 to 100.100.101.7 This seems rather wastefull. Can this be avoided? I could use Sangoma cards in the firewall, I guess. BTW, Does somebody sell cheap cisco's on the net? Leif =20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message