From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 30 09:38:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801D8106564A; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBA18FC08; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz ([212.24.129.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAU9cBhc035863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:38:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4ED5F97E.4040900@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:38:06 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111021 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev References: <201111292232.pATMWINp021704@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111130015504.GB3953@FreeBSD.org> <20111130090313.00003930@unknown> <20111130080947.GA95193@FreeBSD.org> <4ED5F0CA.9010504@FreeBSD.org> <20111130091253.GB4340@FreeBSD.org> <4ED5F505.5070104@FreeBSD.org> <20111130093528.GA7901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111130093528.GA7901@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 212.24.129.198; Sender-helo: pav.hide.vol.cz; ) Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Pawe? P?kala Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-fonts Makefile ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro/files pkg-message.in X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:38:14 -0000 On 2011/11/30 10:35, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:19:01AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> On 2011/11/30 10:12, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>> Seriously, you really think that e.g. `audio/deadbeef' port (and plethora >>> of others) should be named `audio/deaDBeeF' (official name is DeaDBeeF)? >>> >>> (In case of DeaDBeeF I do not consider this name stupid at all. It just >>> does not fit as is into ports collection.) >> >> Since it is the official capitalization used by vendor, I would not >> oppose audio/deaDBeeF neither audio/DeaDBeeF (preferred). > > But first letter should be lowercase, no? (yes, pun intended). :-) It is you who wants a policy about everything, so sure, to follow the letter of the law, it needs to be lowercase. If it was up to me, I'd let it be uppercase. > Pav, ports collection constitutes some ten years of maintaining open source > software (largely diverse), and I do not think that we should either > strictly adhere to any policy or ignore it. Natural evolution of all those > little things, names included, is very important indicator of what our > community feels (in its majority) about the way things should be carried > out. What you seem to suggest goes against observable traditions and does > not help to improve anything in any way. > > (Frankly, I still don't believe you're being serious here.) Newsflash: the community does not really care about these marginalities. -- Pav Lucistnik