From nobody Thu May 19 07:38:55 2022
X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B231B3C2BB
	for <ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 May 2022 07:38:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4L3hYs6FCVz4kPV;
	Thu, 19 May 2022 07:38:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <pi@freebsd.org>)
	id 1nrakJ-0003Wi-Gz;
	Thu, 19 May 2022 09:38:55 +0200
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 09:38:55 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>
To: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
Cc: yasu@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ClamAV security update
Message-ID: <YoX0D2XsbyXq0uk9@fc.opsec.eu>
References: <9fafaa47-0695-389f-11a9-940ab26364fc@netfence.it>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports
List-Help: <mailto:ports+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ports@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ports+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ports+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9fafaa47-0695-389f-11a9-940ab26364fc@netfence.it>
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4L3hYs6FCVz4kPV
X-Spamd-Bar: -
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	dkim=none;
	dmarc=none;
	spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2001:14f8:200:4::4 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of pi@freebsd.org) smtp.mailfrom=pi@freebsd.org
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.91 / 15.00];
	 RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[];
	 ARC_NA(0.00)[];
	 FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[pi];
	 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
	 RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3];
	 TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
	 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.74)[-0.737];
	 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
	 DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org];
	 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.971];
	 R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all];
	 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[];
	 NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.11)[-0.106];
	 MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports];
	 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
	 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
	 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
	 ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE];
	 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N

Hi!

> I see Clamav 0.105.0, 0.104.3 and 0.103.6 were released on May 5th, the
> latter two closing "several CVE fixes".
> 
> However, the port was not updated and not even portaudit entries were added.
> 
> Was this overlooked?

There's a PR waiting:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263944

> Are the FreeBSD ports somehow not affected?

They are affected, but folks are busy with other things 8-(

-- 
pi@FreeBSD.org         +49 171 3101372                  Now what ?