From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 16 18:59:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406EF46D; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:59:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07D41251F; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:59:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa07.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8GIxBml023399 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:59:35 -0500 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([169.254.1.202]) by LTCFISWMSGHT04.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.15]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:59:18 -0500 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Jamie Gritton Subject: Re: jail configuration Thread-Topic: jail configuration Thread-Index: AQHOsw7Yi5v9g74/DUKG4v+K2pdx5w== Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:59:18 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FBCB529@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> References: <8661u2kppt.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130916130543.GA73887@zxy.spb.ru> <86k3igki36.fsf@nine.des.no> <52370AD3.2060909@FreeBSD.org> <868uywk6y8.fsf@nine.des.no> <523753C9.9070302@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <523753C9.9070302@FreeBSD.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.126] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-09-16_05:2013-09-16,2013-09-16,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , Devin Teske , Slawa Olhovchenkov , "arch@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:59:43 -0000 On Sep 16, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Jamie Gritton wrote: > On 09/16/13 11:33, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >> Jamie Gritton writes: >>> Yes, I've let jail startup go for too long - I really meant to put it in >>> for 10.0 but the recent slush kind of surprised me (which means I'm just >>> not keeping up). After 10 splits off, it's time to just do it. >>=20 >> How about we just ask agree on a patch, then ask re@? >=20 > If they're good for it, I am. But if it's to go in for 10, I'd think > that update script would need to be a part of it. >=20 > On the rc script itself, jail(8) has the ability to take multiple jails > on the command line and start them all. I'd prefer to go that route > rather than looping through the jails in the shell, since it allows for > jail's support of dependencies and parallel startup. >=20 In the patch DES submitted, I don't see why one couldn't use an fnmatch(3) expression as the jail name. In fact, his start routine uses a default jail name of '*' --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.