From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 6 20:52:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8E3106566B for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:52:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f202.google.com (mail-pz0-f202.google.com [209.85.222.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832F38FC1B for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk40 with SMTP id 40so5398635pzk.7 for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:52:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AN/mjMLdt9gRgP6O82tTmrF0bFIvLGLZ8U8FWAxby3g=; b=C1MwH6BvY6sPILDzKvWrWfBnKJJiLWyGiZOGcpgBn0NCkI24RwNt0vwMHiN0D4rVCD 2e60k+Ob6q84ozGIryYmfT9mNV/hVCGXVZ5X/YI3EZBI3hx1l0FIMbJadBbJznRjAsfO JmXdEZz48NvTGCeX/UhQpF/5HzLCOfLCl5sLM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=o2ZrjAkic6/ZKDEBwRJtn1yKk/W3xnEHipn+OmUDT1dwAVD6VqN3BBOH8/yDCxUjww mqRlMZsD1gjDi5TsTprvC1T8Lx+FlYCWnKy2JTuo9BgZ/7RhaK888JE/FtEoD9/fLSRM 0zkf4C4qjGuDpwbA1yGcJLjlzV4d4SpK83+mI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.21.14 with SMTP id y14mr2963540wfi.67.1265489562963; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:52:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100206224504.697dc717@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <1781265383542@webmail54.yandex.ru> <20100206004206.5b87b5ee@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <01qv37-4ho2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4B6D3D80.5000400@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4B6DCBA2.5030202@quip.cz> <20100206224504.697dc717@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 12:52:42 -0800 Message-ID: <7d6fde3d1002061252i19aa684aw8363ac1ca61c4c29@mail.gmail.com> From: Garrett Cooper To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent massive port update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:52:43 -0000 On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote= : > On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100 > Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > >> Matthew Seaman wrote: >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > >> > On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> > >> >> Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be >> >> rebuildet first? >> >> >> >> I rebuilded everything - but i have no idea about the order aof >> >> port reinstalling. >> > >> > Actually that's not necessary in this case entirely because the >> > commit was so large. =A0Every port that needs to be rebuilt because >> > it depends on libjpeg has had it's PORTREVISION bumped. =A0That means >> > that if you just do a 'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' the right >> > thing will happen automatically. >> >> >> No metter if there is revision bump or not, it should be in UPDATING >> as it was in case of jpeg-7. >> >> 20090719: >> =A0 =A0AFFECTS: users of graphics/jpeg >> =A0 =A0AUTHOR: dinoex@FreeBSD.org >> >> =A0 =A0The IJG jpeg library has been updated to version 7.0. =A0Please >> rebuild all ports that depend on it. > > No need, since it a port has a new version, a rebuild is expected. Excessive documentation is not any more helpful than no documentation. I would think it's relatively common sense to rebuild all applications that depend upon a library, and the things that handle this requirement should do so in a seamless manner, and are from my understanding (minus manual port installations). Cheers, -Garrett