Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:18:22 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: clang compiled kernel panic when mounting zfs root on i386 Message-ID: <50D2F3FE.1000509@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50CF9AA9.1030808__28729.3355250315$1355782864$gmane$org@FreeBSD.org> References: <50b37d46.8584440a.735c.ffffb4e6@mx.google.com> <20121126171658.GD3013@kib.kiev.ua> <20121127071243.D1255@besplex.bde.org> <20121129232944.GQ3013@kib.kiev.ua> <50b8a9c5.e64dec0a.1d88.133a@mx.google.com> <20121130164715.GW3013@kib.kiev.ua> <50b9cf0c.0fd9650a.5bbf.ffffb9b3@mx.google.com> <20121203224132.GJ3013@kib.kiev.ua> <50C880D7.1040907@gmail.com> <50C8DC8E.1080204@FreeBSD.org> <50C9AD2C.7000301__8690.12248372219$1355394383$gmane$org@FreeBSD.org> <50CF16B0.9090104@gmail.com> <50CF9AA9.1030808__28729.3355250315$1355782864$gmane$org@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
18.12.2012 00:20, Andriy Gapon: > It's been already mentioned many times that ZFS works much better on amd64. > It's up to a (potential) user to understand limitations of i386 and to decide > whether to use ZFS, in what situations and how. > > You may want to consider using KSTACK_PAGES=4 in your kernel configuration. For last two fays my system seems stable on kernel compiled with KSTACK_PAGES=4 and WITH_CLANG_IS_CC. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50D2F3FE.1000509>