From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Tue Feb 9 16:31:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B02AA2447 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miguelmclara@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAC1D10B4 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miguelmclara@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 78so118827679lfy.3 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:31:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=TD72E19m/C/UgzaZ7XrWfccw+DOJxFHHu+Y9JfX1Blw=; b=YLUwkGN46B6E9k5MhrQlCRpk1mCWdacFnpkZdw5urrE1u6zxct5cE6+31p+8URchoh YBIqcdxvOXY+E9cxub58s1VoeYtZ1pXGcyOGXeL0CGcchwo0X+sFk027mPAVU1O4LWPN 9Z/6JDmN76wQOXZDrIPYnNrb18orTh7VNz/SJ6FUXCc4FDe01yO3H5/LpPk/hkR/mmtY x4jGY3IZq2lQi3DLp06vcCK+1ygIil2SxMpKd0D12rdlVCZvuoRybF1Bm6gOHzyYpRNW iNtljXeWj39IzGf+ke4j1tKetQZICHEOxFPHJF4ja1c9tsUi8tpvkvCtnmOrWDIR51hO LWew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=TD72E19m/C/UgzaZ7XrWfccw+DOJxFHHu+Y9JfX1Blw=; b=jM2qFlmb+H3MaNFVVC1medpAgcYaEpPYf7RYOFkch1S2ou1sH9bGGutEmmQV1iTLkw Wp6ttxZ6yPsIKQ1Dar5tshGoEhgpq8Kyf+P8raD+yTUQ/6V59sUIXTE9U7WERqmJbAQt ktk72P2BERGJN21x0SmR4fVQv/woQGI7xy0Eoa8nloBY9Yes3Y2ta3uNyUurdToTqI86 Tlwx/fN4AEXzNrGHOrvxBFCrVIpUcWyCXa2tU5LaLBDmZngdqjSKBfawmCqifcfPa9h0 Uld/yG7AJpM4apaFlsjz3+uNLSGee4l8XiiRdxehTPi2aPiHExxplsrPsHwaaQF4RHSn iNUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTe5invTWks43R0w2c6t/U71iwDjFTEilNxxmAr6CrzeCj9XVmY7lkC3T6EHTgrma+bJNdXPWYc+nuSlQ== X-Received: by 10.25.77.203 with SMTP id a194mr15559297lfb.62.1455035483392; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:31:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.19.94 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:30:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201602091326.u19DQ5EU010981@higson.cam.lispworks.com> References: <56AD3AB6.4050404@meixner.dk> <56AD7502.7020604@meixner.dk> <201602081819.u18IJcIY011408@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <201602091326.u19DQ5EU010981@higson.cam.lispworks.com> From: Miguel C Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:30:43 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Call for Testing: CentOS c6_64 ports now with 32bit libraries. To: Martin Simmons Cc: Johannes Jost Meixner , "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:31:27 -0000 On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 21:26:55 +0000, Miguel C said: > > > > --089e011770cf92b957052b48ded9 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Martin Simmons > wrote: > > > > > >>>>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 01:17:45 +0000, Miguel C said: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Miguel C > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Johannes Jost Meixner < > > > > > johannes@meixner.dk> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > >> Hash: SHA256 > > > > >> > > > > >> Hi Miguel, > > > > >> > > > > >> you'll have to svn up to the latest portstree, apply the patch, > > > > >> update/reinstall the relevant packages (in this case, > > > > >> devel/linux-c6-devtools), and try again. > > > > >> > > > > >> I'm actually using git, but I'm assuming master branch is in sync > > > with svn > > > > > > > > > > FYI linux-skype_oss_wrapper still fails to build after the patch > with: > > > > > > > > Stop. > > > > make: stopped in > > > > > /usr/home/miguelc/gitstuff/freebsd-ports/audio/linux-skype_oss_wrapper > > > > [miguelc@r2d2:~/gitstuff/freebsd-ports/audio/linux-skype_oss_wrapper > ]% > > > > sudo make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes > > > > ===> Building for linux-skype_oss_wrapper-0.1.1 > > > > /compat/linux/usr/bin/gcc -m32 libpulse.o -o libpulse.so.0 > > > > -fstack-protector -shared -lpthread > > > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /lib/libpthread.so.0 > > > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > > > I can see libpthread.so in /compat/linux/usr/lib > > > > > > > > find /compat/linux/ -name 'libpthread*' > > > > /compat/linux/lib64/libpthread-2.12.so > > > > /compat/linux/lib64/libpthread.so.0 > > > > /compat/linux/usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 > > > > /compat/linux/usr/lib/libpthread_nonshared.a > > > > /compat/linux/usr/lib/libpthread.so > > > > /compat/linux/usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a > > > > /compat/linux/usr/lib64/libpthread.so > > > > > > Just an idea: have you installed the 32-bit glibc? That should provide > > > /compat/linux/lib/libpthread.so.0 etc. > > > > > > > > Hum, I was under the impression that 32-bit libs would still be installed > > alongside... wasn't that the purpose of the PATCH? > > Sorry, you are right, it should be installed by linux_base-c6. > > Nevertheless, you are somehow missing at least these files: > > /compat/linux/lib/libpthread-2.12.so > /compat/linux/lib/libpthread.so.0 > > Do you have the two libc files below? > > /compat/linux/lib/libc-2.12.so > /compat/linux/lib/libc.so.6 > > If not, then I suspect your linux_base-c6 doesn't contain the patch. > > I was just looking into that acctually cause my "/compat/usr/lib" only shows this: ``` drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3B Feb 7 23:30 alsa lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14B Jul 23 2015 cpp -> ../usr/bin/cpp drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 3B Jan 31 00:58 lsb drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2B Jan 31 00:57 modules drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 6B Feb 7 23:30 terminfo drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 3B Jan 31 00:59 udev ``` However I do have the patch (or had the one from the other day, maybe I need to update, I noticed a few more changes were made) I wonder how to do that without wiping the ports dir and refetch? I'm using git, so I guess If I can revert the arc patch I can maybe "git pull" again and then re-apply arc patch on top of the updated ports tree? > __Martin >