From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 15 2:53:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F7D37B401; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 02:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9F9qwa46742; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:52:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" Cc: "Soren Kristensen" , "MurrayTaylor" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WanIC 405 _IS_ End of Life -- what are the (netgraph) based alternatives?? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Oct 2001 01:56:25 PDT." <002f01c15557$44f1d660$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:52:58 +0200 Message-ID: <46740.1003139578@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <002f01c15557$44f1d660$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>, "Ted Mittelstaedt" writes: >An interesting proposition. However, you might find it even easier to >do a Hitachi HD64570-based board. It should be much easier to modify >the sr driver to work with it than to write a new one from scratch. We want something with an integral T1/E1 DSU/CSU, otherwise cost is still prohibitive. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message