From owner-cvs-all Wed Jan 20 01:48:02 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA04191 for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 01:48:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns11.rim.or.jp (ns11.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.230]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA04169; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 01:47:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from masafumi@aslm.rim.or.jp) Received: from rayearth.rim.or.jp (rayearth.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.242]) by ns11.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2-ns11/RIMNET-2) with ESMTP id SAA04726; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:47:51 +0900 (JST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by rayearth.rim.or.jp (8.8.8/3.5Wpl2-uucp1/RIMNET) with UUCP id SAA12193; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:47:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aslm.rim.or.jp (8.9.1/3.5Wpl3-SMTP) with ESMTP id SAA07216; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:33:30 +0900 (JST) To: billf@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: max@wide.ad.jp Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/portscanner - Imported sources From: Masafumi =?iso-2022-jp?B?TkFLQU5FLxskQkNmOiwybUo4GyhC?= In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 17 Nov 1998 12:46:44 -0800 (PST)" <199811172046.MAA02894@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <199811172046.MAA02894@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93 on Emacs 20.3 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-PGP-Fingerprint: 00 D8 2C CA C7 75 D4 40 5C 34 39 BA A5 46 C0 CC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19990120183328H.masafumi@aslm.rim.or.jp> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:33:28 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 980905(IM100) Lines: 20 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Another comment regarding pretty old commit. > billf 1998/11/17 12:46:44 PST > ports/net/portscanner - Imported sources > Update of /home/ncvs/ports/net/portscanner > In directory freefall.freebsd.org:/x/tmp/cvs-serv2866 > Log Message: > Initial import of portscanner, a quick and dirty way to scan ports > similar to strobe, but much quicker, and good for use in scripts and CGI. While the net category seems okay for this port as strobe is alson in the net category, another port scanning tool, nmap, resides in the security category. We need consistency here, I think. Maybe we should move nmap from the security to the net category? Thoughts? Cheers, Max To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message