From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 29 23:13:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC00B21337 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 23:13:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21F6182F for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 23:13:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1539133C22; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 19:03:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B2A5E39819; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 19:03:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To: Reko Turja Subject: Re: How to build and install only ntp from base? References: <8E3E519163BD4A1CB7A76F8D10E4E3E7@Rivendell> Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 19:03:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8E3E519163BD4A1CB7A76F8D10E4E3E7@Rivendell> (Reko Turja via freebsd-questions's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2016 19:12:40 +0300") Message-ID: <448tzwc91h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 23:13:07 -0000 Reko Turja via freebsd-questions writes: > As nothing else has changed with the latest 10.3 except ntp I'd love > to compile only that. I just can't find the right incantation for > starting the compile - make just tells me that > is up to date. cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp make all install You didn't need to guess: this IS in the Handbook... > What command should I use to compile ntp stuff only - or should I just > fire up the version from ports? Using the version from ports is certainly reasonable -- it gives you a lot more options and is updated more often -- but unless other machines are synching to yours, it's unlikely that the advantages (either way) would matter.