From owner-freebsd-doc  Mon Jul 12 14:31:28 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0BFFC14D30; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from sheldonh@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id OAA67417;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: <sheldonh@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <199907122128.OAA67417@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: jobaldwi@vt.edu, sheldonh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/12595: [PATCH] New FAQ Entry: "Why shouldn't I just go ahead and run -current?"
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: [PATCH] New FAQ Entry: "Why shouldn't I just go ahead and run -current?"

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: sheldonh
State-Changed-When: Mon Jul 12 14:26:12 PDT 1999
State-Changed-Why: 
The submitter and I are in agreement that Daniel's FAQ entry wasn't
really intended as a serious FAQ that would actually reduce the number
of questions asked on -current or -hackers. :-)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message