From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Mar 28 08:08:41 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA11729 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 08:08:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ki.net (root@ki.net [205.150.102.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA11718 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 08:08:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (from scrappy@localhost) by ki.net (8.7.4/8.7.4) id LAA02829; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 11:08:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 11:08:26 -0500 (EST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: "Amir Y. Rosenblatt" cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: status of Linux and ICBS2 binary compatability In-Reply-To: <199603281443.JAA06858@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 28 Mar 1996, Amir Y. Rosenblatt wrote: > What is the current status of Linux and ICBS binary copmpatibuility,for > 2.1R, -stable, and -current? > Reports have it that Linux support in -current is to the level of being able to run Quake...just what I've heard, as I haven't quite found the time to check it out yet :( I don't believe that this support is reflected in -stable, and am 99.9% certain it isn't in 2.1R (its something new in -current, and 2.1R isn't being updated anymore...that's what -stable is) Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail Telnet Acct DNS Hosting System | WWW Services Database Services | Knowledge, Administrator | | Information and scrappy@ki.net | WWW: http://www.ki.net | Communications, Inc