From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 30 8: 4: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from guild.plethora.net (guild.plethora.net [205.166.146.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7F037B719 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:03:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from seebs@guild.plethora.net) Received: from guild.plethora.net (seebs@localhost.plethora.net [127.0.0.1]) by guild.plethora.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f2UG3vK00524; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:03:57 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200103301603.f2UG3vK00524@guild.plethora.net> From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) Reply-To: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: tech-kern@netbsd.org Subject: Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:04:45 +0200." Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:03:57 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Harti Brandt writes: >I suppose. But neither gcc nor Sun-cc seem to support it :-( Sure, but at least it's guaranteed to work on C99 compilers. [0] is not guaranteed, and if they suddenly refuse to compile it, you have no grounds for complaint. -s To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message