From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jun 14 0:24: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from server.research.zopps.fi (ws99.research.zopps.fi [195.165.196.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A4C14BD4 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 00:24:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from martti@research.zopps.fi) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by server.research.zopps.fi (8.9.3/8.8.8) id KAA65902 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 10:23:04 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from martti.kuparinen) Received: from ws125.research.zopps.fi(195.165.196.125) via SMTP by ws99.research.zopps.fi, id smtpdf65800; Mon Jun 14 10:23:02 1999 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 10:23:01 +0300 (EEST) From: Martti Kuparinen To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Lockups: should I go back to 2.2.8 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG While running tripwire in our server, the system locked up (well, in fact the load went up to 600+ and the whole system became unusable, so it was not a panic or dead-lock). The operating system is 3.2-STABLE and "make world" was performed last friday. The host is NFS server with small average load. The question is: if I need a rock-solid system as it is our main server for 20 people, should I downgrade to 2.2.8-STABLE? I think I can't afford to wait for the VM thing to be fixed, but I don't know if 228-S has similar symptoms, i.e. do I win something by going back to 228-S? Martti To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message