From owner-freebsd-mobile  Wed Jan 28 14:35:39 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA09961
          for freebsd-mobile-outgoing; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:35:39 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from dns.pinpt.com (dns.pinpt.com [205.179.195.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA09953;
          Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:35:37 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from schluntz@clicknet.com)
Received: from clicknet.com (gatemaster.pinpt.com [205.179.195.65])
	by dns.pinpt.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA06978;
	Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:28:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <34CFB248.19DB454@clicknet.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:33:44 -0800
From: "Sean J. Schluntz" <schluntz@clicknet.com>
Organization: PinPoint Software Corporation
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en]C-DIAL  (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
CC: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Do you need PAO on FreeBSD v2.2.5?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

I had been told that you didn't need to use PAO under FreeBSD v2.2.5
that the 'stock' pccard support was working fine.  Is this correct? 
I've been having problems getting a 3Com 3C589D NIC running and I'm
wondering if I would have more luck with PAO.

-Sean