From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 19:00:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7812106564A; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:610:652::211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712F78FC17; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D4081CCDC; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:00:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:00:31 +0200 From: Ed Schouten To: Roman Divacky Message-ID: <20080914190031.GA81522@hoeg.nl> References: <20080914153840.GO1191@hoeg.nl> <20080914185144.GC86425@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080914185144.GC86425@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Patch] Compiling COMPAT_SVR4 without COMPAT_43 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:00:32 -0000 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Roman Divacky wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 05:38:40PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > > Hello everyone, > >=20 > > I just build this patch on my system at home. Fortunately I'm not a user > > of COMPAT_SVR4, but I thought some of its users may actually find it > > useful. > >=20 > > The attached patch should allow COMPAT_SVR4 users to use it without > > having COMPAT_43 in their kernel configuration. Any comments? I'll > > commit it when (if) I've received any feedback. Thanks! >=20 > looks good to me. I believe you might want to ask jhb@ as he seems > to know of some users of SVR4 (at yahoo! ?)... >=20 > just out of curiousity... why did you do this? I was running a random grep on our source tree on COMPAT_43 and I noticed svr4 had this #error in it, so I thought: I wonder what would happen if I'd remove the #error. It turns out only two socket functions used actual COMPAT_43 bits, so that's why I wrote the patch. Thanks for pointing me to jhb. I'll contact him. --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkjNX08ACgkQ52SDGA2eCwXKTQCfUEgX6lXjd2w4+1p0T1sT0K98 +fcAn23vz0/yRCg+s+nGvQm4FIWPyyeM =fYDL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--