Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:00:13 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] Message-ID: <20050728210013.GA18923@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <42E94487.6090909@exit.com> References: <C3B81AFDB8A5DFB5AB566CC4@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <42E81050.7090305@cs.tu-berlin.de> <66A226C3557B48ED535E3FED@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050727230523.GB54954@isis.sigpipe.cz> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> <42E917BA.10406@exit.com> <FACB47A35BF38243FBC04766@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <42E94487.6090909@exit.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 01:48:07PM -0700, Frank Mayhar wrote: > Now correct me if I'm wrong, but tcl, itcl, tk and iwidgets were already > in ports, were they not? So they could not possibly have been "submitted > with a maintainer of 'ports@freebsd.org.'" For sake of completeness, yes, they could have. The policy is fairly new. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050728210013.GA18923>