From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul  6 23:06:45 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6595516A500
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  6 Jul 2006 23:06:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F7843D46
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  6 Jul 2006 23:06:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id C2EF241F2; Thu,  6 Jul 2006 18:06:44 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:06:44 -0500
To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
Message-ID: <20060706230644.GA10830@soaustin.net>
References: <20060705022209.GC6831@soaustin.net>
	<20060706230347.GA946@k7.mavetju>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060706230347.GA946@k7.mavetju>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] latest round of bsd.*.mk changes committed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 23:06:45 -0000

On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 09:03:47AM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
>     How about BROKEN (software doesn't work for some reason), IGNORE
>     (port infrastructure doesn't work because if port building
>     requirements not met) and FUBAR (port infrastructure itself is
>     fucked up (distinfo wrong, failing patches))

Well, we currently also use IGNORE in some cases where the port builds
successfully but then doesn't run (e.g. coredumps).

mcl